Thursday, 14 June 2012

¿Cómo tratar el mundo África

It has become imperative that the ideas underlying every African nations was those eminent to the present day rage which has of course blast every gentle mind to fury. A day of terror approach where there will be constant betrayal and in this betrayal, brothers will sell their kindred to slavery in terms of new global slave trade known as 'economic dependency'.
But nonetheless, nations have taken the lead in correcting the ills and wrongs of the 'big five' nations. Nations have stood their ground and has taken their destiny, and at which point they have done the best bid by defending their course diplomatically in the theatre of international arena. Some of these nations knew the mysteries underpinning their suffering, yet they have played along course the ideologies of the 'big five', being used as battle ground for selfish purposes. It is regrettable that even citizens of these nations have fell Snell to this obnoxious nonsense just like the proverbial Judas Iscariot in the holy Bible. Imagine the endless and senseless wars in Iraq, Iran nuclear escapade, North Korea' stubbornness to disarm all nuclear aspirations, Israel's mutiny with neighboring factions like the Hezbollah military stronghold, Palestine's breakage and the suicide bomb warranty, Lebanon and the outside codified ally, the Fatah/Hamas struggle for political supremacy, U.S ego-problem with the oil rich nations, Africa's nations and the eminent problem and resolutions to the civil war affected areas.
The controversies over ethics and morality in the global setting are beset by complications of what is the subject of the discussion and what influences globalization has on the features of societies in an international system. There are some international truths that must be unfolded before everything controversial in international politics and the ideal mystery of the Big Five can be settled within themselves without rubbing other nations of their mal-Unity. Are there many reasonable moral views, some of which stand in contradiction, in the world? Are there universal moral norms which no state or person may disregard without being blameworthy from the moral point of view? Is a "my citizens first" ethics compatible with right behavior? Who, if anyone, answers morally for the destruction of lives and ways of life in foreign countries through the consumption of richer countries? And how does all this apply to international law?
If these questions and numerous others cannot be answered, then I m afraid that the Unity and life span of UN is limited to grand zero actualization, despite past height in international peace reconciliation. The bridge that binds nations together under the ties of the UN will be broken forever, and the result will be constant political unrest, International evils in economy, technology and discovery, Terrorism and Wars, Usurpation of National Sovereignty, disloyalty to international constitution as it reflects the UN, national ego-ideal focus, bilateral and trade exploitation, increase in embargo due to fear of the unknown apart from terrorist attacks, diseases and high mortality rate.

Well in terms of its beneficial inter-relatedness, numerous coefficients serve to warm up African Consciousness, which has started to take effects in the areas of Global Mutiny and economic considerations, Africa which they term as developing has arrived at the isles to be self peopled, economically viable, and in my opinion, this is advancement taking place...So Globalization can be taken from either sense as classed economy or the United Nation's perception of power tussles. What I like to know also is the random ideological mutiny, which the Big Five has in post economic exploitation of the more sensitized and conscientized African Communities that claims to be moving towards development. At the height of augmentation, Mozambique, Gambia, Zimbabwe and the rest other southern and eastern nations of Africa are said to be near develop. Then the ethical questions is; what where the parameters that was used in determining the height of economic growth? When with mere eye-saw, these western nations with their economic sickles, and paranoid behaviors in economics, politics, inventions, science and technology, democracy and the like has affected the African Nations with their beefs within its shores.
It is more obvious, if Africans have forgotten so soon that we do not as Africans subscribe to the ideal barbarian lifestyle of the west, and as such those nations of Africa who once defended these way of life, and who where direct student of Marcus morsiah Garvey call for African's consciousness has been bought over simply for the urgency to unify allies in a bid to overcome perceived enemy of so called world-police nations. Our subscription with due course is to the overall unity of all African nations hence the ideal conception and impregnation of the African Unity (AU). Better still the hope of an average African is growth and peaceful co-existence of all Africans undermining civil wars which with respect to numerous investigations where directly and indirectly fueled by the so called western super-powers.
Although I do not refute that America's influence has not better the tremendous growth of Africa's economy and democracy. This is true, but it is imperative to know that America and her ally has done on the other hand a great harm to African nations through her romance with rebels, which on most cases has been denied by the American government and her allies. The truth is whatever the course today, America would have been able to intervene. But it seems more to every rational thinker that America is only interested in personal and national gains rather than humanity and global realization in peace and war free universe, yet propagation to end all wars is at the corner. This is itself an irony because within the Israeli/Lebanon brief war, we saw where the U.S took side, and gave Israel all needed expertise, when we know that Aaron Sharon still has supporters who where active during the genocide period of Palestine/Israel faction of the 1980's. If no nation will blame US for her involvement in wars, oil and nuncupative arrogance in nations sovereignty, then I am sure sooner or later, another apocalypses will emerge as the 'third world war'. Our fear is that this should not occur, but the way America, Russia, china, extremist Islamic nations are handling matters towards this global and techno-politico era, I fear another world war is zooming the gap of time.
On one hand, one cannot persecute their involvement with these African nations, and thereby unjustifying their wishes and aspiration. The Big five is just certainly the problem of the world, and the UN knows this. They are still the actors of colonization, and during these age of technology, they have adopted advance techniques and warfare to push their devices into sorting for higher egoistic good in Africa, and somehow in the Middle east; as an African Political philosopher Professor Ayodele Adebayo put the terms, "there is only one war to be fought, and this is simply for economy reasons, and man's utmost agitation to alienate his fellow man" Therefore, it is wise that Nations through the UN ties should come together and reason out ways of settling the cold war tussle between the Big Fives and their allies.
When I read the article put forward by my Lord, jaja malonga, I was striped naked of my empathy towards the different types of phobia man in his survival of the fittest has developed over the years. And I have reason seldom awkward in thoughts that it may be right on the ground that it depicts empirically the economic and moral surge the world has been afflicted with, and how the crisis came out as related by ethics, religion, economics, technology and the drive for survival in hard time during the world industrial revolution that took a hell peak at one historic time.
I will always repeat that although the League of Nations has its demerits, but United Nation's demerits has presided all the Demerits of the leagues of Nations plus the Second World War. The death toll today has tripled itself, and the nations to call for these disasters are seen now perpetuating and sponsoring other Israelis for baseless wars against Lebanon and Palestine and agendas in Iraq, Iran, Africa and the rest of the world - this in itself do not make me an Anti-American, rather As an Apologist of a more sensitized global justice which all nations strives to attain. Apart from the UN, there are member-nations whose solemn good is self centeredness, and to say the least these members are the real racist and extremist of the world and not the perceived arrogant Islamic extremist and fundamentalist, the real sponsors are term the Big-five of which most of us are politically aware of as being US, RUSSIA, BRITAIN, FRANCE, GERMANY etc, and so it will do us no necessary good if we continue to hide under diplomacy as a parameter to resolving our global differences between Nation-States.
Since they are the only nations that can help in structuring out facets for international relations through globalizations, Trades, investment and social and international securities. They must collectively fight a just course and call the middle east and Africa to global dialogue, instead of the threat given to them through sanctions - they must carry them along in every advancement, development, agenda and ethical principles, this is inclusive of the ethical justification for all as reasoned by member nations who are themselves not among the Big five, the Big-Five member states includes USA, Russia, China, Britain and Japan.
In one word, this cannot work as it is a reflection of bias and annihilation of the less developing nations (Third word Countries). Meanwhile there are other areas that the executive councils of the UN can formulate policies to bring to book those articulate agendas that will lead to Strategic progress and a back off of African Land, thus global peace and Understanding between all aggrieved nations and individuals. This is not just done to Africans alone, the Middle East are also affected. No wonder the increase in terrorism and wars.
The purpose of the formation of the UN was to bring about bilateral relations among nations, and for them to help each member states in reconstructing the war dilapidated areas of the world war two and poorer nations. The only way to stop terrorism is not to perpetuate terror to terrorist, rather peace and tolerance can only happen when world unity is the agenda of the day, where respect for life, rights, sovereignty, agendas and the like are discussed in the executive and security council of the UN where member-nations are present. We must dialogue peace; we must call all aggrieved nations and individuals together and reach an agreeable consensus. Let no man or nations be called a terrorist, fundamentalist, extremist and diplomatic enemy of another nation. We should take into cognizance that nations have their rights to internal resolution of crisis, and they don't expect other nations to interfere except when it affects the lives and properties of the timid Masses.
During the past five decades, many countries, often those born of decolonization amidst colonization, revealed themselves to be no more than pseudo states, without solid institutions, internal cohesion, or national consciousness. The end of communist coercion in the former Soviet Union and in the former Yugoslavia also revealed long-hidden ethnic tensions. Minorities that were or considered themselves oppressed demanded independence. In Iraq, Sudan and Afghanistan rulers waged open warfare against their subjects. These wars increased the importance of humanitarian interventions, which came at the expense of the hallowed principles of national sovereignty and non-intervention. Thus the dominant tension of the decade was the clash between the fragmentation of states (and the state system) and the progress of economic, cultural, and political integration - in other words, globalization.
Everybody has understood the events of September 11 as the beginning of a new era. But what does this break mean? In the conventional approach to international relations, war takes place among states. But in September, poorly armed individuals suddenly challenged, surprised, and wounded the world's dominant superpower. The attacks also showed that, for all its accomplishments, globalization makes an awful form of violence easily accessible to hopeless fanatics. Although this is what the world see them to be, but in my humble Opinion, they are just some bunch of depressed souls wondering and contemplating the level of torture they have received from the Big Five, in most case America and Russia as the leading champions of these oppression. And this was only possible through their involvement with the UN; hence UN only served as a citadel of post economic and sovereign terrors who appear to be the world police, and whose drive is for the oil rich agenda in Iraq, the middle east, irrelevant policy allied agenda with Israel against any perceived enemy states such as Palestine, Lebanon, Iran, Iraq.
Sooner or later, terrorism will be championed from the Africa and core Asia minority states, because the US involvement in the reach oil regions of Africa such as the Niger Delta is beginning to take awkward effects, through opinion polls of the Nigerian rationalist, they and including myself have posit that, the US sudden Military base in the Niger Delta has an Ulterior motive from the US depute Secretary of State, Sir Negroponte himself, a man who is known to eat lions. This is the same man who lobbied the congress being used as Bush Administration's puppet to champion the dis-arment of Saddam and his final execution; this was the same man fueling the un-reconciliation and bilateral impunity between Rice and Hezbollah of Iran, the same man championing Fatah/Hamas stronghold. What can such a man do to better the economic life of the Niger Delta people and Nigerians if not to use the elites in slaughtering the minorities? He has been so careful and strategic enough to use his fraudulent political antics to confuse Mr. President Umaru Ya A'dua to grant him military base in Nigeria. Since when has Nigeria become member of the western or eastern block? Or do they think that Africa will one day be used as their dust-bin and testing ground for policies? This can only happen when Africans are reluctant to approach the suspicious western policies championed by Germany, Britain, US and their Allies.
The truth in this wise is not far fetch. America as a leading pathfinder of the Big-five has seldom looked upon themselves as the real problem of world peace, amounting to what becomes truth, America, Britain, France, china, north Korea, Russia, Japan etc and its allies have done nothing other than sharing the world into nations of their own, like the Asia economic interest in Africa, in fact it grieves my hearts to discover very recently that even china, Philippines are all working in same scourge to alienate Africans, and thereby re-colonized its territories. As long as i support creativity, economic relations between nations, I nevertheless would submit to the economic ulteriorness of nations having weird and fake Agenda for Africa's urgent development if not for self and economic interest, both advantageous to the communist nations and a slap to the economic and global integrity of the Nation-state at it expense. The wondering continues as this is a stylish way of post colonization and imperialism. The rest of the world is just being fooled and blinded because they kind of lack the economic, political, humanistic, socio-ethical and moral values to handle national issues. I sometimes wonder when these stiff neck, cancer worm Big-five nations will cease to interfere in other nation's affair, becoming spies and the actual terrors of the world. I hope Mr. Bo ki Moon - the newly elected UN secretary general will map out strategies to aid world's understanding of what the Big-five Nations are up to.
Terrorism is the bloody link between interstate relations and global society. As countless individuals and groups are becoming global actors along with states, insecurity and vulnerability are rising. To assess today's bleak state of affairs, therefore, several questions are necessary- I was able to ask this moral questions during the conference in New Delhi, Australia, Middle east - Lebanon, Cyprus and Syria . What concepts can help explain the new global order? What is the condition of the interstate part of international relations? And what does the emerging global civil society contribute to world order? These and many more are the necessary contingent questions that must be answered by the Big Five, in technical terms they are the Global police. In theory they monitor the political excesses of nations why they press for the reserves of self consciousness and own national benefits. It is imperative that the Big Five has become a threat to the developing and less advance nations in terms of Global warfare of all kinds, ranging from the accumulations of nuclear weapons and economic arrest through sanctions.
Two forensic models made a great deal of noise in the 1990s. The first one -- *Francis Fukuyama's "End of History" thesis -- was not vindicated by events. To be sure, his argument predicted the end of ideological conflicts, not history itself, and the triumph of political and economic liberalism. That point is correct in a narrow sense: the "secular religions" that fought each other so bloodily in the last century are now dead. But Fukuyama failed to note that nationalism remains very much alive. Moreover, he ignored the explosive potential of religious wars that has extended to a large part of the Islamic world. That even the less religious tolerated nations now embark on religious Mutiny and rivalry, it is now being fashioned as perpetuated by political insensitivity of Politicians in most African countries as in Nigeria, Sudan etc, and other countries of the middle east, Asia and some part of Europe.
Fukuyama's academic mentor, the political scientist *Samuel Huntington, provided a few years later a gloomier account that saw a very different world. Huntington predicted that violence resulting from international anarchy and the absence of common values and institutions would erupt among civilizations rather than among states or ideologies. But Huntington's conception of what constitutes a civilization was hazy. He failed to take into account sufficiently conflicts within each so-called civilization and the national context, he made a blatant error in so far that he was not mindful of his conscience, rather he judged too emphatically; and he overestimated the importance of religion in the behavior of non-Western elites, who are often secularized and Westernized. Hence he could not clearly define the link between a civilization and the foreign policies of the United Nations' member states. Meanwhile he was able to fashion a model for lasting economic solutions through the realization of the elite poorer nations. There was an institution that was built to conscientize citizens and the national polity in terms of national allegiance of which they owe a mechanical solidarity.
Comrades, after much dissertations presentation on international politicking by the western and the global policing of this same western world, I was able to come up with an Ideal conception of how this lasting problems can be possible through an inevitable solutions of a proper international Dialogue between member states of the UN to define their roles in the international political scheme of things; and how well their rights can be preserved without causing any furiousness in the eyes of member states who have felt intimidated in the last few decades, and whose sovereign right they felt was trampled upon politically.
I have prepared this dissertation works, and on the next conference in Novo Scotia, Canada in December 17th 2007 (which has been postponed to 18 January, 2008, this agenda shall be placed forward and deliberated upon. This also shall be the first time that a Black man has ever confronted the world problems from an imperceptible ground of rationale, and thereby would pull the entire power bunches together who called themselves 'the Big-Five'; and of which the greatest moral question of our time will be raised and resolved. And in so doing they either make a choice of settling down towards peace, forgoing the obsession of the "Biggest Guy in the World syndrome" or be made to face a catastrophe that will profit no nations but destroy the world in sevenfold all living creatures both Humanity, Animals and all that was created except the dust of the earth. This is evident at least with the modern stiff neck of nuclear bombs manufactured by nations of the world.
I have seldom asked if the Black will profit in this bid, and the answer to this question is true: the black will gain, but it will be on the ground that their WILL may flourish economically and otherwise and their ideals to an infinitesimal rational conclusion to world peace will be guaranteed. Although other black scholars have tried the same task I threading through. I know it will not be easy, but I must work the saddest mile to liberate my people and the Blackman from total alienation. The Black nations must surely take their place in the order of international politics....This is sure!
I have littered this article to be seconded by my fellow Black scholars who have held same opinions over the past years; this can also serve as a catalyst to persuading the world that the Black nations - Africa, Asia and Middle East (If they are actually ready) to take their place in the scheme of things. It is time we act fast before the Snell lingers longer exposing our cowardice and identity as a nations which has long been glaring. This article is open to criticism from proponent scholars of political reputes. I'm calling on all Black scholars to respond as soon as possible given your Opinions about this matter. My major analysis shall be centered on UN for the next 5 months which shall includes intensive submissions of dissertations as it regards how the UN can actualize Peace in this world amongst member states which already comprises of 205 members.
Dr. Carl-Collins Ogunshola Oshodi (PhD)

My Life is a simple one, a very well organized aspect of living. I grew up to be the man i had always wanted to be, and no matter, i will always be what i want to be in life, making those who trust in me very proud people. My Goal is to make a breakthrough in the area of art as it is in science, space, technology and Mathematics. As Mathematics has lead to higher truth, i believe beyond all reasonable doubt that reason alone in the contemporary issues of Humanity will also lead me to higher through. I have tried in my search to finding lasting solutions to the ethical problems of men, and that like the maze of life, we all must stand and pick up the bones, which in a nutshell has been left to rot.
Our lives in this world seems more maribound to those who watches our progress and compliment on them. My goal is certainly to be good, and righteous always. Being "Good" is the veritable source of our pride, honor and all we have fought for in this changing world. Life is good, but there is more to life than the eyes can see, because it also contains some unrealistic events happening.

No comments:

Post a Comment